beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.05.23 2013고단114

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, a truck owner of A. B. his employee, committed a violation of the restriction on operation by carrying the above vehicle on May 6, 2003: (a) around 23:22, 7.4km of the Central Expressway; (b) more than 11.12 tons of the cargo on a 2-scale 10 tons; (c) more than 12:51 on May 10, 2003; (d) more than 40.51 tons of the South Sea Expressway at a 113km of 113km of the total weight; and (e) more than 4.51 tons of the above vehicle on June 4, 2003; and (e) more than 20.10 tons of the above vehicle on June 4, 2003 at a 208 Hun-Ga 1, 2006 Hun-Ga, a public prosecutor, who was subject to the restriction on operation by the Constitutional Court Act (amended by Act No. 1068. 15.21. 5.21.21.21.204.5.25.5.25.25.21.21.25.21.21.2004.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.