If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 06:30 on October 26, 201, the Defendant confirmed the personal information by the Assistant Inspector D of the Mapo-gu Police Station at the site after receiving a report from the manager thereof, and confirmed the fact that the Defendant issued a warrant of execution due to the present payment of a fine, and notified the Defendant of the fact that the Defendant requested accompanying, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the Defendant was issued a warrant of execution due to the payment of the fine; and (b) provided the Defendant with the warrant, “I do not have to do so; (c) do so; (d) do so with the warrant, she will do so; and (d) assaulted the coke part of the above DNA slope on one occasion by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate police officer's performance of official duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report an investigation (attached a copy of a fine for negligence to A) (the arrest of a suspect);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;