However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 2010 to 2011, the Defendant was running “C”, a waterproof construction and waterproof company, and the Defendant was supplied with eux gas from polyx Co., Ltd. to the victim, but did not pay KRW 300 million. On April 20, 2012, the victim company received an order to pay the above KRW 300 million against the Defendant and received an order to suspend the transaction, and the Defendant was in the crisis at which the transaction would be suspended. Accordingly, the Defendant was able to receive goods by actively paying the price.

On July 2012, the Defendant, who received a demand from the C Office located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to pay the outstanding amount from the E, an employee in charge of the victim company, at the early stage of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office, may fully pay the outstanding amount to the F Company and G Company’s receiving the said money.

If you start transactions again and supply the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas of the gas.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, from around 2006, the Defendant borrowed money from another person, financial institution, etc. and repeated the repayment of money. From around May 2013, 2012, the Defendant had a total of KRW 400 million without compensation from the customer, loan companies, etc., except for the victim’s debt to pay interest on borrowed money. The Defendant was so called so-called “refusing to return” such as payment of interest or principal on other obligations with a large amount of monthly expenditure from the loan to pay interest on borrowed money, etc. The amount to be paid from the customer, F Company, and G was merely the actual amount of KRW 1,00-20 million. Since from around 2013, the amount of money to be paid from the customer, F Company, and G company was established and operated separately from the victim company, there was no intention to pay all liabilities equivalent to KRW 300 million incurred prior to the supply of goods or to receive new goods.

The defendant is the victim as above.