The judgment below

In light of the records, the court below was just in finding that all of the primary and conjunctive charges of this case constitute a case where there is no proof of criminal facts, and it did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the consent of the victim in larceny and on the intent of unlawful acquisition in embezzlement, and not affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.