If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On March 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was engaged in driving of Dran-car; (b) was driving the said car on the road in front of the front of the Yol-dong Yol-gu, Sungnam-si on the right-hand road; and (c) was making a left-hand turn on the three-lane, which is a straight-on-lane from the left-hand surface of the summer distance to the right-hand surface; (d) was negligent in neglecting the duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering gear and brakes; and (e) was negligent in failing to perform the duty of care to prevent accidents; (e) the victim E driver’s e-car, who was directly located on the right-hand side of the Defendant’s left-hand side of the car; and (e) was inflicted with the victim, who did not immediately stop the said car for about three weeks, and at the same time did not cause the victim to suffer any injury, such as a conical salt requiring a medical treatment for about three weeks; and (e) did not immediately stop the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs on the collision of both vehicles;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Punishment provided for in the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, which is heavier than punishment);

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserts that E was not in a position of injury due to the instant accident.

Modern, Modern, each of the above.