beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.04.26 2019고단1203

절도등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be returned to the person who has lost the name of the victim.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on May 7, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul East Eastern District Court on May 7, 2016, and on April 28, 2017, the Seoul Northern District Court sentenced the Defendant to 1 year and 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ansan Prison on January 29, 2018.

1. Larceny;

A. On January 10, 2019, at around 16:23, 2019, the Defendant: (a) opened a entrance door and came into a entrance door using the current entrance door password, which had been already known in the past, that he had been living in C, from the first floor of Si/Guri-si B; and (b) stolen the Defendant with one of the self-written MTB bicycles equivalent to KRW 600,000 at the market price owned by the victim D who was located in the corridor.

B. At around 11:48 on January 13, 2019, the Defendant: (a) stolen the Defendant, with one part of a partpet bicycle, which is equivalent to KRW 1,200,000 in the market price set up by the victim G, at the Fatt front parking lot located in Guri-si E.

C. On January 13, 2019, around 14:48, the Defendant: (a) on the first floor of the IP building located in Silri-si H; (b) on the part of the victim J’s son’s market price, the Defendant stolen the Defendant, with one set of merda rod bicycle, equivalent to KRW 700,000, which the victim J installed.

2. On February 2, 2019, the Defendant found one soviet smartphone 1 in so far as the market value, which is owned by the victim of the non-name, lost, of the non-defluence Y, on the first half of February 2019.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The police statement of M;

1. Written statements concerning G, J and D;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: One copy of criminal records, summary order, eight copies of written judgment, and one copy of the confinement status of each individual;

1. Criminal facts;