견책처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "(1)" of the first instance court's 4th and 23th and 5th and last 19th 2th 2th 2th 3th 3th 2, "each of the 5th 15th 15 and 7th 1st 3th 2th 3th 2th 6th 1 and 6th 2th 10 "each of the 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 2th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 19th 6th 6th 19th 6th 6th 19th 6th 6th 6th 19th 6th 6th 6th 196th 6th 6th 6th 6th 2nd 2nd 2002th 2th 2th 2th 200.
“To the effect that the Plaintiff’s assertion is alleged, but even if it is assumed that part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is a fact, such circumstance alone alone makes it impossible to deny or justify the Plaintiff’s act of misconduct.” In addition to adding the same contents as those stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, as well as adding the same contents as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the
2. According to Article 25 of the Act on Public Audit related to 1 procedural defects, the head of a higher-level institution subject to self-audit is notified of the audit results and can apply for review with regard to the results of self-audit conducted by the head of a higher institution. In this case, with regard to the audit results conducted by an office of education, the head of a higher-level institution subject to self-audit, the head of B elementary school school, which is the head of an institution subject to self-audit, shall notify the Plaintiff of the audit results