2. The judgment recognizes the instant crime and reflects the Defendant’s mistake in depth, and it appears that the Defendant’s company might suffer difficulties if the custody of the Defendant is prolonged.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant only six times since 2000, without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was punished by a suspended sentence of imprisonment and a fine, etc. due to drinking driving; (b) driving a vehicle without a driver’s license under the influence of blood alcohol concentration of 0.136%; and (c) the nature of the crime and the criminal status are very poor; and (d) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, it is deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.