특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Interference with business;
A. On April 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 18:40 on April 17, 2015, the Defendant returned to the entrance and the vicinity of the eart operated by the victim D in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) caused the victim to be unable to enter the eart by avoiding disturbance, or getting the customers to leave the eart, by stating that “if the eart is, where the emb, the embbs, where the embs, the ebs, where the ebs, the ebs, where the ebs, the ebs, where the ebs, the ebs
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's marina business by force.
B. On April 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 14:20 on April 25, 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (b) prevented customers, who entered the said garment from entering the said garment or leaving the said garment at the place of the garment on the front of the said e-line operated by the victim D; (c) obstructed the garment of the garment, walking the broom installed by the broom, walking the broom, cutting down the broom, and obstructed the walking of the people who passed the said garment, etc.; and (d) allowed them to leave the said garment at that place.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's marina business by force.
2. Around April 17, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the Victim G (76 years of age) who collects an empty stuff in front of the said Empt, stating that “Influence, the Gabbling will do so,” and assaulted the Victim G (76 years of age) by putting the Victim’s breath into a breath, flading and profing the flab, and cutting into the Victim’s blag with his hand.
3. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation, etc.) and the Defendant interfered with business were arrested of police officers dispatched after receiving a report on 112 on the same grounds as the above paragraphs 1 and 2, and were investigated at police stations and brought them to be asked for a warrant of detention to the victim D in relation to the request for a warrant of detention.
around 17:30 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant found in the Empt above Empt and held B in the cell of “B” to the victim.
b) whether the application was made;