However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 11, 2016, at around 00:08, the Defendant damaged the victim’s market price equivalent to KRW 500,000,000, on the ground that the victim C’s “D cafeteria” in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu’s operation was fluor, and that the child’s play glass was fluored in the process of the fluor’s and the fluor’s common meeting with the fluor’s ties,

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 366 (Punishment of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Persons whose sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act is mitigated, such as damage to one property, etc. whose basic aggravation of the classification of types is to be mitigated, from January to June to August to June to June to the special sentencing guidelines: The sentencing guidelines is to be recommended for mitigation (unwritten punishment): The sentence to be mitigated (one to six months): The general sentencing factors: the sentence to be mitigated in April: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of four months: the imprisonment for a period of four months: the suspension of execution; the imprisonment for a period of two years; the surveillance of protection; the cumulative sentence for forty hours; the cumulative sentence of forty hours; the cumulative sentence (three times of a fine); the confession of a victim; the victim's non-prosecution of the punishment; and