사기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the sentence of the court below that sentenced the defendant 10 months of imprisonment is too unreasonable, in light of the fact that the defendant was actually on his own, and led to the crime of this case, the 18 victims and the victims agree smoothly, and each damage amount was deposited for the remaining four persons.
In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the lower court appears to have taken into account all the aforementioned circumstances already asserted by the defense counsel; (b) the Defendant had not been aware of the history of having been punished on several occasions as a crime of fraud; (c) the Defendant had committed the instant crime during the repeated crime period; (d) the victims of the instant crime were many victims; and (e) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, including the Defendant’s age and environment, the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit.