If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Defendant

A is a person who operates the “D frequency” in Gyeongjin-gun, Ulsan-gun, and Defendant B is a person who operates the “F cafeteria” located in Gyeongjin-gun, Ulsan-gun.

1. Defendant A committed the crime of Defendant A provided food, etc. to customers at the above D frequency from January 30, 201 to December 28, 2011, and settled KRW 227,29,000,000, in the name of the card merchant of the above F cafeteria, which was the representative of Defendant B, and performed credit card transaction by means of credit card transaction under the name of another credit card merchant.

2. Defendant B committed the crime of Defendant B, at the same time and place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1), had the users use of the said “D frequency” in the name of the card merchant of the said F cafeteria, and lent the name of the F cafeteria’s credit card merchant to another person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of each police suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to the charge book and field inspection report;

1. Article 70 (2) 3 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act and Article 19 (4) 3 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act (Selection of Fine): Defendant B: Articles 70 (3) 6 and 19 (4) 4 of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act (Selection of Fine);

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act