On April 16:30, 2019, the Defendant was driving a D Poter freight vehicle in front of the C resting area located in Mosung City, from the Ansan to the parallel. On the ground that the F Poter truck drivened by the victim E is not flicked while driving the F Poter, which is a dangerous object, in one lane from the two lanes to the one lane among the two lanes, the Defendant got the victim to get the back part of the Defendant’s driving freight vehicle in the front part.

As a result, the Defendant, carrying dangerous things with the victim, suffered injuries, such as salt, tensions, etc., in need of treatment for about two weeks, and the victim’s above cargo vehicles are in the clerical error of the “companion” as stated in the indictment for the front offender.

In addition, the repair cost of 3,350,973 won was damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Field map of a traffic accident;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. On-site photographs and images, the CD (bcambling) Defendant and the defense counsel. The Defendant asserted that “the Defendant, following the victim’s cargo vehicle, entered four short blasts and changed the two-lane to a two-lane because the victim’s cargo vehicle did not turn on the way,” and thereafter, the Defendant changed the route into five-lanes, while changing the route into one-lane, he did not enter one-lane, thereby making the bark go through several times, and in the process, conflict with the victim’s cargo vehicle. Accordingly, the Defendant is a simple traffic accident, rather than causing injury or damaging the cargo vehicle. Moreover, the victim’s cargo vehicle’s repair cost is exaggerationd.”

Domins, Domins, .