However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 5, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from a Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong site, and on March 18, 201, received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from a Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong Site.

On April 28, 2014, at around 00:30, the Defendant driven B vehicles under the influence of alcohol with a volume of approximately KRW 200 meters from the beginning in front of the high singular singing room to the front of the same time in the middle of the salary class in the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver, and the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, etc. and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order to Attend a lecture is that the defendant drives a motor vehicle in the same drinking condition three times in spite of the same kind of alcohol driving skills, in light of the fact that the defendant, who recognized the facts charged in this case and took an attitude to reflect his mistake, again, there is no history of punishment higher than the fine, and there is no history of punishment higher than the fine, and all other circumstances shown in the record, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, etc. are considered.