Although the Defendant did not have met C around April 20, 2012, and only C met around July 23, 2012 but delivered a phiphone, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of all the facts charged in the instant case and erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

Judgment

Around July 23, 2012, the lower court and the trial court consistently accepted the following circumstances, namely, from the investigative agency to the court of first instance, C, upon D’s request on April 20, 2012, provided that 100,000 won was received from D and 0.03 g of c. c. 2 of c. c. c. 3 of c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. 2 of 2012. c. c. c. 2 of c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c. c.