If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 12:00 on April 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) visited the Defendant’s house at the Defendant’s house at 102 dong 302, 302, 202, and 12:0, the Defendant inflicted injury on the Defendant’s Matern C (23 years of age) who visited the Defendant’s house at the Defendant’s house; (b) caused the Defendant’s meatization of fakes during a conversation; and (c) caused the Defendant’s meatization of her head debt; and (d) caused approximately two weeks of her face to take care of her face as drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Part concerning the dismissal of prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. At around 10:30 on March 19, 2013, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s head at a drinking time on the ground that the victim C was employed as a dietitian at the above university restaurant without the consent of the Defendant in the FS-R car parked in the E-university sports hall parking lot located in Macheon-si, Macheon-si.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim submitted a written withdrawal of the complaint on August 21, 2013, which was after the institution of the instant indictment, to the effect that the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant. Thus, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6