Seized evidence 2 or 3 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

The Defendant knew that there was a notice in the Internet BC “C” stating that there was an article that the so-called “Singing” staff seeking withdrawals, deliverys, etc. to deliver the defrauded money to their own, and that the Defendant would contact the staff of the “Singing” and offer the withdrawals, deliverys, etc. of the crime of “Singing”, thereby receiving the damages from the victims, and did not deliver the said damages to the aforementioned “Singing” staff.

1. Around July 12, 2019, the Defendant made a proposal to the effect that “D and E, which came to know in the above “C” Kapets from July 12, 2019, shall enter the account in the name of E, shall have to take part in the middle of a street collection,” and D and E accepted the proposal.

The Defendant proposed “F” to “F” an employee of the Defendant, who became aware of through the above “C” page, to “F” have an account necessary for the criminal act of licensing, and thus, if the amount of damage incurred from the criminal act of licensing is transferred to the said account, the Defendant would withdraw it and transfer it to the account designated by the Party.” The Defendant accepted “F”.

Accordingly, the Defendant was willing to commit the crimes of “F”, “D, E” and “Sing.”

From July 12, 2019, “F” sent a text message to the victim G to the effect that “to invite a low interest rate loan product.” The phrase “F may obtain a loan up to 35 million won if an existing loan is repaid to an account designating five million won,” and then received a delivery from the victim via the H bank account (I) in the name of E around 15:10 on July 12, 2019.

Defendant and D had H Bank in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government withdraw the above five million won from H Bank, and Defendant, D, and E did not deliver this to F, and divided it.

Accordingly, the Defendant is “F”, “D,” and “E.”