The Defendant, working as the vice president from the victim D to the victim D, was a general manager of the program development project promoted by the above D company, who currently serves as the E representative director, and F is in charge of the above D business overall affairs from around 2002 to 2008.

He/she retires, and from October 2012 to June 2014, he/she is the vice president of G Co., Ltd., and from November 2014 to H’s representative director.

The Defendant, in collusion with F in collusion with F inception to invite human resources for program development through J, Inc., a corporation operated by I in connection with the small-line program development project promoted by the victim company (KTS SP maintenance project) and, as such, it was difficult to seek human resources to be urgently invested in the program development project even if the program developer is not a program developer, the Defendant recommended the technicians recommended by F to the above I and K managing the victim company, which is the human resources to be actually invested in the program development project, and, in fact, recommended to work on behalf of F;

1. On June 10, 2014, the Defendant submitted to F along with F a resume, etc. as if he/she knew that L was unable to work at the above development team located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M& building with knowledge that L would work as a technician, submitted L’s resume, etc. as if he/she would work as a technician. On or around the 19th day of the same month, the Defendant had I and K enter into a human resources supply contract for L’s retroactively with L’s 10th day of the same month and work as a deceptive scheme by having I and K enter into a human resources supply contract for L’s 10th day of the same month, and F would interfere with F’s employment of human resources

2. Around October 27, 2014, F sent a false resume to F with respect to theO that is not a technician to F, and on the 29th of the same month, the Defendant was unaware of the fact that the O’s curriculum was false, but the Defendant was unaware of the fact that the O’s curriculum was false, but he was unable to work in the development team through F. However, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the O could not work in the development team.