2. The part which is dismissed or added by the judgment of the court of first instance shall be replaced by the attached list of "the amount of personal use" of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Article 20 of the first instance judgment provides that “The retirement age of the plaintiffs shall be December 31, 2016,” and Article 21 provides that “The retirement age of the first Plaintiffs shall be the date of birth of the said plaintiffs, and the retirement age of the second Plaintiffs shall be December 31, 2016.”

Part 4 of the first instance judgment "the cause of the claim" in Part 10 of the first instance judgment shall be "the cause of the claim and the defense of the defendant's interim income deduction."

The fourth to fourth of the judgment of the first instance are as follows. The fourth to fourth of the judgment of the first instance are as follows.

The retirement age provision of this case does not exist from the beginning. In this case, the retirement date of the above plaintiffs is the date of each birth of the above plaintiffs in 2016 with the date when the above plaintiffs reach 60 years of age. The above plaintiffs' wages additionally received when they retire on the birth date of each birth date in 2016 are the same as the amount stated in the attached Table's "payment", "performance pay", "retirement allowance", and "retirement allowance". Dur the wage calculation period, plaintiffs R, AC, AL, AS, AZ, BA, BK, BK, B, and BO have worked in another workplace and earned profits during the wage calculation period, and their so-called intermediate revenues to be deducted from the above wages are the same as the amount stated in the "intermediate income deduction column" in the attached Table's "in the attached sheet", and the defendant is obligated to pay the above plaintiffs the following amounts to the above plaintiffs from the judgment of the court of first instance to the next 5th of the judgment.

Therefore, the defendant.