상해등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the judgment of the court below is too unreasonable (4 months of imprisonment with prison labor for crimes No. 1 and 2 as indicated in the judgment below and 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for crimes No. 3 and 4 as indicated in the judgment of the court below).
2. There is no change in circumstances that may consider the sentencing after the judgment of the court below, and considering the various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable even considering the circumstances asserted by the defendant on the grounds of appeal.
3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 37 subparag. 10 of the Resident Registration Act (the illegal use of another’s resident registration number) in the application of the law of the lower judgment is a clerical error in Article 37 subparag. 10 (the illegal use of another’s resident registration number) of the former Resident Registration Act (amended by Act No. 14286, Dec. 2, 2016). Thus, it is obvious that the Defendant’s appeal is a clerical error in the former Resident Registration Act (amended by Act No. 14286, Dec. 2, 20