A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 2,500,000 won for the defendant corporation B (branch).

, however, the defendant.

1. The defendant A shall not employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) as the representative director of the Company B (branch) located in Syang-si; (b) on March 15, 2014, from around September 7, 2016 to around September 7, 2016, indonesia F (G male), H (I male), J (K), L (M male), N (O male), P, R (S birth), R (SU (W birth), X (W birth); (c) Z (AAB); (c) Z (AC); (d) Z (AC); and (e) 15 and 15 and 30,000,00 local governments of the Switzerland (AE), Vietnam (AF); and (e) 15 and 630,000 local governments of the Vietnam-si (AH).

2. The above Gap, the representative director of defendant B (branch), committed the above violation in relation to the defendant's business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Each foreigner's statement;

1. A written accusation;

1. A certified copy of a certificate of employment of foreigners, a business registration certificate, a full certificate of registered matters of the corporation, each registered foreigner record list, and a detailed inquiry into immigration records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Submission of a suspect A’s written statement and a certificate of registration);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Articles 94 subparag. 9 and 18 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act, and choice of imprisonment

(b) Defendant B (branch) Company: Subparagraph 2 of Article 99-3, Article 94 Subparag. 9, and Article 18 Subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B (branch) of the provisional payment order: The number of foreigners employed for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is large, and the period is considerably longer, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in light of the punishment records of Defendant A; and