beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.01 2017고정3231

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 15, 2017, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the victim D (Woo, 51 years of age) and the removal of warehouse in front of the wife population C, living in adjoining areas, facing each other, and the face of the victim, and suffered injury, such as the victim's face part on one occasion due to head, and the victim suffered about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. On-site photographs and photographs of damaged parts of the victim;

1. Notification to the department related to the report of 112 case;

1. The defendant asserts that the victim's bodily examination report submitted [the defendant did not have the face of D as head, and the mother and child's her mother, who was using D, had his/her body contacted with his/her head.

However, the witness D, however, her face is left by the defendant with his/her head and her face and her booms down from the snow.

Specificly and consistently stated, it is also consistent with on-the-spot photographs and victim-victim photographs, notification to the reporting department of the case 112, and examination of the victim's injury.

Witness

E considered that the head of the defendant was even satched and the mother was removed.

The defendant seems to have shown his argument as it is, and eventually, it is reasonable that the defendant was able to live.

A statement consistent with the facts charged in the instant case was made.

Comprehensively taking account of this, the facts charged in this case are found guilty.

Defendant

The witness F did not conflict between the defendant and D, and D exceeded her mother and child while D reached the defendant.

The EF stated that the witness E was not present at the time of fighting.

The statement is completely different from the statement of the witness E, which seems to take into account the defendant's position, and F has been seen from the beginning to the end, and D has been re-written to it.

but did not avoid the face of D.

That is, on-site photographs and victims.