When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant and the victim B(n, 37 years of age) are the relationship between the two parties.

On November 2015, the Defendant requested a conversation at the “D” store operated by the injured party in Ulsandong-gu C and the second floor in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, 2015, but the victim refused it, and caused a disturbance for about 30 minutes due to the following reasons: (a) the injured party's refusal to do so; (b) the beer, the beer, the beer, the beer, the beer, the beer, the storm, the damage, and the destruction of the wall to re-beer, and the destruction of the hole.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the victim's smooth operation by force, and destroyed the wall with one studle and one stude owned by the victim, thereby damaging the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316 of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;