[criminal power] On September 27, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution on August 27, 2012 by the Seoul Central District Court for the crime of interference with business, etc., and the above sentence became final and conclusive on November 30, 2012, and was still under suspension of execution, and was in force 16 times

【Criminal Facts】

1. Interference with business;

A. On January 8, 2014, from around 23:40 to January 00:10, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the victim E’s hotel operation by force for approximately 30 minutes, such as: (a) casino employees at the entrance of a casino located in Seoul Metropolitan City from around 23:40 to around 0:10, in order to prevent the Defendant from having access to the casino for exclusive use by foreigners on the ground that it is a foreigner-only casino.

B. On January 12, 2014, at around 21:35, the Defendant: (a) parked the Defendant’s Ecoos vehicle in front of the G hotel entrance located in Seoul F; and (b) neglected the Defendant’s request of the said hotel employees to move the vehicle; and (c) obstructed the victim H’s hotel customer service and security management duties by force for about 55 minutes by neglecting the Defendant’s request.

2. In the date and time set forth in Paragraph 1(b), and at the place, the victim I (23 years of age) who is a hotel security personnel came to enter a hotel, the victim was able to prevent the defendant from entering the hotel, and the victim was able to go to the right side and to go to the right side for about 14 days, which requires treatment for about 14 days for the next victim.

3. On January 13, 2014, at around 00:52, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the damage of property by cutting down a hand-off fire engine, so far as the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the 112 and 182, was at a criminal room in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, by using a public telephone terminal owned by the 167 Mine Police Station, in order to prevent the use of a public telephone, and caused the damage by cutting down the hand-off fire engine so far as it makes it difficult for the Defendant to do so.

4. The Defendant is different from K, etc. on the ground that the victim JJ prevented him from using public telephones at the time and place specified in paragraph 3.