H빔 등 인도청구
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
On March 2010, the Plaintiff decided to keep H beam beam (300 x 300.10 x 940 km) 134 tons, H beam beam (300 x 200.10 x 650 km) 10 tons, poppy (100 x 100 x 100 x 3 x 6) and one container stuff (3 x 6) in the Defendant’s storage place, and delivered the above H beam beam, etc. to the Defendant. As such, the Defendant returned the above H beam, etc. to the Plaintiff. Since the Defendant used the above H beam beam, etc. at many construction sites, the Defendant reduced its value by using the above H beam beam, etc., the Defendant sought compensation for damages for the amount of KRW 101,647,600 per ton, calculated as a 3 million container, and damages for delay.
The facts that the plaintiff stored about 9.165 tons of sn beam beam, about 2.9 tons of sn beam sn beam, about 2.9 tons of sn beam and one container (hereinafter collectively referred to as "storage material") in the defendant's storage yard are not disputed between the parties, but it is not sufficient to recognize that the entries of sn beams of 5 through 9 (including each number) in each of the evidence in subparagraphs A are stored in the defendant's storage yard that the plaintiff stored the h beam beam, etc. as alleged by the plaintiff in excess of the storage quantity,
In addition, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the duty to deliver the stored materials is impossible, and only the statement of Gap evidence 10 is insufficient to recognize that the market price of the stored materials is the amount as alleged by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.