beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.02.05 2014고단1938

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:30 on December 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault to arrest the said H as a flagrant offender; (b) the Defendant committed an assault to the victim G (hereinafter referred to as the victim) who walked with the said H’s chest in order to stop the Defendant, walking the 10-day medical treatment for about 10 days, including a slope G belonging to the F Zone Unit of the Gyeonggi Mann Police Station in the Yan Mannan Police Station; and (c) the Hah’s Hah’s Hah’s Hah’s Hah’s Hah’s Hah’s Hah’s Hah was to stop the Defendant; and (d) committed an assault to the victim G (including 42 years of age) who walked with her nose for about 10 days in need of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes, and at the same time injured the victim G.

2. Defendant B

A. On December 3, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as the victim I (30 years of age) who is an employee of the said hotel, spiting spiting, spiting on the floor, threatening the victim's face by drinking spiting spiting, and leaving the victim's face, as the victim was taken out with the victim's face, at around 02:25 on December 3, 2014.

B. The Defendant committed an act of obstruction of performance of official duties, at the same time, at the same place as Paragraph 1, and at the same time, at the same time and place as that of Paragraph 1, and with the suspicion of assaulting the Defendant as a flagrant offender, the Defendant attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and threatened him as if he was pushed the Defendant’s chest with her hand and her hand, and the Defendant committed an act of assaulting the Defendant’s bat with her hand as her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol against J;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Investigation report (to be accompanied by elCCTV images and photographs);

1. Statement of opinion;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged victims;

1. Criminal facts;