2. The instant crime was committed on the ground that the victim had not sold credit to the Defendant, thereby causing injury to the victims including the child of 1 years old, on the ground that the victim had not sold credit to the Defendant, and the quality of the crime is not good.

However, the defendant is aged, and all of the crimes of this case are recognized and reflected.

In the first instance, medical expenses and consolation money were deposited for victim E in the court, and KRW 500,000.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentencing of the lower court cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too unfasible.

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.