However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 14:30 on June 9, 2020, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle of the victim D(the age of 63) to drive the motor vehicle of the victim D(the age of 63) unfairly entered his/her own vehicle and was playing on the road in order for the victim D to stop the motor vehicle in front of the above SPP car, thereby allowing the victim D to receive the back portion of the above SPP motor vehicle's right side of the above SPP car in front of the above SPP car, thereby causing the victim D to suffer injuries, such as kele and tension, which require treatment for three weeks on the left side of the above SPP motor vehicle, and causing the victim D to own the above SPP motor vehicle of the victim F. 385 and the above 37 SPP to be damaged by the victim F.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a dangerous object, and inflicted an injury on the victim D, and damaged the victim F's automobile.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement statement made by the police about D, the actual situation investigation report;

1. A medical certificate and a report on inspection of automobiles;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury), 369 (1), and 366 (a) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Jan. 1, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 2, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Da11448, Apr.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (in addition to the grounds for discretionary mitigation, taking into account the fact that there is no past record of a single type of fine and no past record of crimes);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;