정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(정보통신망침해등)등
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., both types of punishment) that the court below sentenced against the Defendants (e.g., imprisonment for three years, confiscation, and confiscation for one year, and one year) is too unreasonable.
2. The defendants recognized all the facts of each of the crimes of this case as well as the fact that they are against each of the crimes of this case, and the degree of the defendants' participation in each of the crimes of this case seems not to be much severe. However, each of the crimes of this case is very poor in light of the crime period and size, etc., the defendants committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the repeated crime period, each of the crimes of this case is highly likely to harm the safety and reliability of financial transaction through electronic media, and abuse them as a means of various crimes. In addition, considering the balance between the punishment and the accomplice, the motive and background leading up to each of the crimes of this case, the age, character, and environment of the defendants after the crimes of this case, the punishment of the above defendants is too unreasonable, and the punishment of the defendants is not justified.
3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.
(However, in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, it shall be corrected that the “A” in Chapter 7 of the original judgment is changed from “A” to “A”.