2. Although there are circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and tried to arrest another person who committed a crime, cooperation in the investigation, and showing the intention to arrest another person who committed a crime for narcotics, the defendant has been sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for the same kind of crime in around 2014, and the defendant purchased and administered several times during the suspension of the execution of the crime, and taking into account all of the sentencing circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relation, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the defendant's punishment imposed by the court below is not deemed unfair, and thus, the defendant's assertion is not acceptable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per

[Ex officio, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the court below's decision shall be corrected as it added "the part related to 2018 Highest 2480" among the summary of the evidence of written evidence of the court below.

.