보증금반환
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 20,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 12% per annum from January 3, 2019 to the date of complete payment.
1. On September 21, 2016, the Plaintiff leased the 4th, 5th, and 5th, from the Defendant, the 20,000,000 won in the Jeju-si building, monthly rent of KRW 1,30,000, and the period from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2018. The Plaintiff operated the D Insignia club with delivery of the 4th, and 5th, respectively.
On June 2018, the defendant notified the tenants of the building that they will perform large-scale repair works after the construction of the building.
In order to perform the above large-scale repair work for the plaintiff, the defendant knew that the removal of the escape room, which is a building installed within the plaintiff's place of business, is inevitable.
No volatile club operated by the plaintiff shall be operated unless it is lost due to the characteristics of the type of business.
The building owner made a decision on the repair and repair of the building and inevitably D also entered the temporary rest in February and March 2, 2019.
An elevator enters for two months, and a man's room and a woman's room are new in five floors.
(A) The long-term member or the remaining member of the National Assembly will be extended to two months on the face of the two months.
The members who were not harsh will be feasiblely fluently frien.
On December 2018, the Plaintiff posted the following public notice at the business site of the Buddhist Day.
On December 10, 2018, the Plaintiff posted the following public notice to the place of business:
On December 4, 198, the owner of the building must deliver the primary construction to D on December 13, 198, so that Korea has operated only until December 31, 200.
이번 공사로 인하여 우리 D는 큰 손실과 함께 피해금액이 너무 큽니다
It is expected that the construction period will be more than two months, and it will be expected that it will be refunded from the date of the increase.
A lease contract is concluded on the ground that the plaintiff could not operate his business due to the removal of the defendant's loss.