However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 30, 2015, around 18:27, the Defendant was requested to present an identification card from F, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station E District Team E division of Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, which called “D Company,” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Seoul, upon receiving a report from 112 that a drunk person caused a disturbance, and called “D Company.” On November 30, 2015, the Defendant was asked to the said police officer “I am Dokkh, I

“Affortly, fford the chest of the above police officer by hand, and obstructed legitimate performance of duties concerning the investigation, prevention, etc. of the police officer’s crime by assaulting the chest of the police officer.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] [Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties: [the basic area of interfering with the performance of official duties] There is no person [the person who is subject to special sentencing] [the sentence] [the purpose and degree of the crime in this case; the defendant's age, sexual conduct, criminal records, circumstances after which the defendant was found to have committed the crime in this case; and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the proceedings of the pleading in this case, such as the defendant's age, criminal records, and circumstances after the crime, the suspended sentence of imprisonment was mitigated

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.