beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.05.25 2016고단2963

특수협박등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the husband and wife who reported the marriage between the victim B (the female, the 41-year old and the 2003.

1. A special intimidation: (a) on November 8, 2016, the Defendant repeated a knife knife (7cm in length on the knife) knife knife, which is a dangerous object in possession of the victim, while drinking alcohol at his own house of 504 Do-dong 1304 Do-dong 1304 Do-dong 1304 Do-dong Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, a dangerous object in which the victim had a wind and has a dispute.

Mabro Mabro Mabro Mabro Mabro Mabro Mabro

“Accomageed,” and by carrying dangerous objects, threatened the victim.

2. In order to catch the head of another victim’s head, who is up to the bleep of the victim’s head, at a time and place of paragraph 1, and to take the victim’s head by hand, the injured Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, i.e., brain-dead, etc., without an open two wifes in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements of victims);

1. Articles 284, 283(1) (a) (a point of intimidation to carry dangerous articles) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a fine for choosing a punishment (such as the fact that a person commits any contingent crime, which is suspected of committing an unlawful act between husband and wife, and the fact that damage is minor, the defendant repents his mistake in depth as a primary offender, and the victim does not want the punishment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.