도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The sentence against the accused shall be five million won or more.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
On October 7, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Northern District Court on Seoul Northern District Court on May 24, 201, to a fine of one million won for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (not taking measures after the accident), a violation of the Road Traffic Act (not taking measures after the accident), and a violation of the special family law (doing vehicles) by a suspended sentence of two years
On March 19, 2019, at around 04:37, the Defendant driven a DNA knife vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.059% from around 300 meters to the front road of the same Gu’s hotel.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;
1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, etc. inquiry reports and investigation reports (report on confirmation of criminal records of driving under the same kind of a suspect);
1. Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (Amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018); the choice of fines for criminal facts;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires the provisional payment order, taking into account the numerical value of blood alcohol concentration on the grounds of sentencing, time of the crime, background of the crime, frequency and contents of the same kind of crime, time interval from the last crime to the crime in this case, the confession of the crime, the fact that the mistake is divided, and any other sentencing conditions shown in the argument in this case, including the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.
``