손해배상(기)
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
The Plaintiffs concluded a lease contract with the Defendant and paid the down payment KRW 7 million. However, even though the Defendant’s failure to cooperate in the performance of the lease contract and the lease contract was reversed, the Defendant was obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remainder down payment of KRW 3.5 million and KRW 1.5 million and KRW 1.5 million and KRW 1.5 million as compensation for mental damage caused by the rescission of the contract, and the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remainder down payment of KRW 3.5 million and KRW 1.5 million as compensation for mental damage caused by the rescission of the contract, and the Defendant B and C, as compensation for mental damage caused by the rescission of the contract.
In light of the above evidence and the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, it is insufficient to acknowledge that the above lease contract was reversed due to the defendant's failure to cooperate in the lease contract. Rather, in full view of the evidence and the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, it is reasonable to deem that the above lease contract was reversed on the ground that the plaintiff Gap should inform the defendant of the password of the entrance door of the leased house from April 8, 2019 even though the defendant decided to deliver the remainder payment date and the delivery on April 15, 2019, although the lease contract was not specified in the contract after the conclusion of the lease contract with the defendant, it is necessary to conclude that the above lease contract was reversed due to a cause attributable to plaintiff A.
Therefore, the plaintiffs' assertion is without merit to further examine.