2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On December 11, 2014, while the Plaintiff (E) was hospitalized at a F Hospital, etc. from June 24, 2014 due to a detailed mental fissionsis, etc., the Plaintiff (E) was hospitalized in the I Hospital operated by the bankrupt medical corporation B (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant hospital”) due to cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral typhism, etc., and received rehabilitation treatment from H Hospital on January 5, 2015, and was hospitalized in the closed ward of the I Hospital operated by B (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant hospital”).

On June 29, 2015, while receiving hospitalized treatment at the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with chronic hiverosis at G Hospital on June 29, 2015, and performed a surgery to provide balutical surgery to the left-hand balute government on the left-hand balute-du-du Government on the left-hand balute balute, and to cut water. On October 4, 2015, the Plaintiff was transferred to the emergency room at G hospital, and received two galutism and dalutism on the same day on the same day.

B. A medical corporation B was decided to commence rehabilitation procedures as of October 13, 2014 by this court 2014hap120, and C was appointed as a trustee. On March 22, 2018, upon receiving the decision to discontinue rehabilitation procedures from this court, the decision to discontinue rehabilitation procedures became final and conclusive on April 6, 2018, and was declared bankrupt as of this court 2018Hahap5, and the Defendant was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 8, 9, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1 to 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. In light of the circumstances such as the Plaintiff’s assertion of the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim, the Defendant Hospital doctor J, nurse K, and caregiver L, on October 3, 2015, taking into account the following: (a) the Plaintiff increased the quality of Catfin, which is a behavior adjustment; and (b) the locked person has to take appropriate measures to prevent abortion, such as raising the dives rail during the course of the locked or wearing the protection belt with the consent of the guardian; (c) however, such measures have not been taken.

Due to the above mistake of the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff was at around 00:50 on October 3, 2015, and was at the time of the abortion.