beta
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2016.10.12 2016가단2440

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Defendant D’s KRW 20,00,00 for Plaintiff A, KRW 5,186,522 for Plaintiff B, and KRW 5,000,00 for Plaintiff C and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. The Daegu District Court Decision 2005Gahap919 Decided the Plaintiff’s assertion of the claim against the Defendant and the claim for interruption of extinctive prescription of the claim based on the final and conclusive judgment in the damages claim against the Defendant (see Supreme Court Decision 208(3)1 of the Civil Procedure Act).