However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 8, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime of August 8, 2016, around 16:30 on August 8, 2016, on the part of the victim’s cell phone collection on the ground that the Defendant did not repay the amount of eight million won (8 million won) borrowed by the victim C, and carried out two times the part of the victim’s cell phone collection on the part of the victim’s cell phone, and carried out three times the Defendant’s left part of the victim’s cell phone with the left part of the number of days to be treated.

2. A crime committed on August 18, 2016;

A. On August 18, 2016, the Defendant infringed upon the residence of the victim by opening a bend window with the victim’s residence and pushing his head with the victim’s residence in the 2** (around August 18, 2016, in the Gu-U.S. nuclear room building; and (b) around 02:30, in the Gu-U.S. nuclear room building, the Defendant 2*

B. Whether the injured defendant was unable to receive a telephone on the ground that he was not able to repay the money borrowed by the victim at the victim’s residence

"At the same time, the victim's face is fleeped once by drinking, the victim's head was flicked once in his place, and the victim's head was flicked once, and the victim's head was flicked five times by drinking, respectively.

As a result, the defendant put the victim on the top side 9 and 10 cage cage cage cages, the left side cages, etc. which require approximately four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Studio photographs and studio photographs of the upper part;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intrusion upon residence), Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harm) and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence shall be determined as the same as the disposition in full view of all the circumstances, including the defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive for committing the crime, and circumstances after committing the crime;