전자금융거래법위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On August 23, 2015, the Defendant reported the job-seeking advertisement of the title "emergency job offers" posted by a mutual infinite guard company at the Internet site " Almonmon" and sent a physical card to the security company "for employment, the Defendant must create an access card to the security company."
At all times, the proposal was received to the effect that the employee would have been employed.
Although the Defendant was well aware of the fact that he was punished as a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act after transferring a passbook and a cash card to another person, the Defendant was able to use the check card for the crime of fraud in case of transfer of telephone financial fraud. However, immediately following the receipt of the above proposal, the Defendant sent the check card and password to a name-free person via Kwikset’s services associated with the Defendant’s name bank account (C) before the Defendant’s office, 205 Dong-gun, 906, and 906, and did not have any guarantee device to receive a return of the check delivered as above.
Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media to the defendant.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Application of the statutes on search and seizure inspection warrant and reply;
1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning the crime, the selection of punishment for the selective punishment, Articles 49 (4) 1 and 6 (3) 1 of the same Act, and the selection of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1448, Apr. 1, 2011>
1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;