except that the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 22:49 on January 13, 2020, the Defendant, while drunk to the Busan Southern Police Station C District, located in Suwon-gu, Busan, Busan, and made a bath by stating “Cerl and Cerl,” and requested the police officers D(57) belonging to the said C District to stop the disturbance and return home, the Defendant continued to put the above police officers to her face, such as her face and other aspects.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' global service and civil petition handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a police investigation report on the defendant's legal statement D (on-site CCTV and police officer block reading and white);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The nature of the crime is not good, and the responsibility of the defendant is heavy, by finding out a police box to have a complaint as to the result of the handling of the case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, it is hard to say that there is no criminal defendant who has been punished by a fine or more severe punishment, and that there is no same kind of power, that the criminal defendant would not re-be punished by a mistake with his depth, and that the criminal defendant would not re-be punished by a mistake, taking into comprehensive account the circumstances of the crime in this case and all other circumstances revealed in the records and arguments of this case, the punishment as ordered shall