2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

A. The summary of the Plaintiffs’ assertion: ① from June 2018 to September 2018, the Defendants expressed false information with respect to the Plaintiffs (e.g., dumping in the canchanch, unauthorized discharge of workplace wastes, use of petular waste without permission, petingly abuse, speculation in dogbs, damage to public notice), and examination fences, etc. on the Kakao Kakao Stockholm Group with children of the Defendants, F and F’s children, thereby impairing the Plaintiffs’ honor by impairing the Defendant’s criticism. ② The Defendants posted an apartment Gao Kao APT (hereinafter “the instant apartment”), published on the bulletin board on November 15, 2018, 2018, Gao-gu GPT (hereinafter “the instant apartment”). The Defendants posted an apartment apartment site on November 10, 2018, 2018; and 3.1.1.2.4. The Defendants’ reputation and 18.1.

Therefore, the defendants are jointly obligated to pay consolation money of KRW 10 million and delay damages to the plaintiff.

B. As alleged in this part of the Plaintiffs’ assertion, the facts that the Defendants did not confirm part of the Plaintiffs’ damages to the cell room of this case, or written comments on which examination fences, etc. were written are indicated do not conflict between the parties, or there is no dispute between the parties, and evidence Nos. 21, 22, 31, 34, and Nos. 24, 26, and 27 (including spot numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) is included.

(ii) recognize by each entry of the Parties, however, that there is no dispute between the Parties or that it is admitted by the entry of evidence of Nos. 19, 20, 25, and 35 as follows: