The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the court of first instance, the court below’s determination that all charges of this case against Defendant A and D are guilty on the grounds as set forth in its reasoning is justifiable. Contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence or by misapprehending the relevant legal principles.

In addition, according to the records, Defendant C will substitute the appellate brief submitted by the Chairperson A on January 12, 2015.

'' merely stated to the effect that it does not claim specific reasons, which cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal.

In addition, Defendant B did not submit a statement of grounds for appeal within the statutory period (which was submitted on January 15, 2015, after the lapse of the statutory period), and the petition of appeal did not indicate the grounds for appeal, and it cannot be deemed that the legitimate grounds for appeal were submitted.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.