A. Defendant (1) There is no fact that Defendant (1) has promised to receive money from H to prepare a written complaint.

(2) The sentence of the judgment of the court below on unreasonable sentencing (the fine of KRW 3 million for the crime of KRW 1 on the market, and the fine of KRW 3 million for the crime of KRW 2 on the market) is too unreasonable.

B. The form of the lower judgment by the prosecutor is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. The testimony was made to the effect that the judgment of H on the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts was made in the court of the trial, and that it was not memory as to whether the Defendant expressed 10% of the agreed amount, or that the Defendant did not prepare the written complaint.

However, on December 20, 201, which is the day on which H submitted the written complaint of this case, it was investigated by the prosecution on December 20, 201, which is the day on which H submitted the written complaint of this case, and it was stated that “A was aware that a criminal case against I was not available before the prosecution, and that it was possible to bring a low-tech criminal case again, and that I would receive 10% of the amount of agreement or reimbursement from I, and that A would also be dissatising. Following this, I stated that “A prepared the written complaint of this case and made it a low satisfy, 96 pages)” (see, e.g., 95 pages, 96 pages). The Defendant also made a written complaint to H, and that it was hard to find that there was a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act’s testimony in light of the circumstances that I would receive an agreement or reimbursement from the first, and there is no reason to believe that the Defendant’s testimony of this case is 15%.

B. The defendant and the prosecutor.