손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid additionally shall be revoked.
1. The reasons for this court's explanation are as follows: ① Of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, the calculation table of the attached amount of damages shall be replaced as follows; ② the following is added to the 6th sentence or lower; ③ the 6th to 12th sentence; ③ the 6th 6th 10 to 12; and the 6th 6th 18 to 20th ; and the 7th 6th 12th ; ④ the 4th 7th 4th / [based on recognition] 11 is the same as the entry of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance; and thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
【Additional Part of the Plaintiff’s assertion to the effect that the portion caused by injury to an infant shall also be included in the rate of loss of work ability. However, the Plaintiff’s application for modification of the purport of the claim and the cause of claim as of December 5, 2013 did not include the above contents, and it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff lost work ability due to injury to an infant only by the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s assertion to this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is rejected. 【The portion used for future treatment” from 10th to 12th, 6th, 6th, 100 won per annum for two years for mental and medical treatment. The Plaintiff’s first disbursement was deemed to have not been made on May 13, 2016, and the causal relation between the Plaintiff’s dental accident and the Plaintiff’s medical expense of this case cannot be viewed as having been paid to the Plaintiff at the time of the second accident from 6th to 20th, 18th, 2013.
h) from 7 pages 6 to 12.
Therefore, the defendant's 23,948,069 won and 23,99 won to the plaintiff.