However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 04:45 on March 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report that the Defendant did not pay a taxi fee in the Hansan-si B No. 112; and (b) received questioning of the circumstances of the instant case from the head D belonging to the Police Station of the Ansan-gu Police Station C District of the Ansan-gu Police Station, the Defendant took an act of assaulting the Defendant, such as taking the Defendant’s 112 report and taking the Defendant’s her head into action to interfere with the performance of official duties, and obstructing the Defendant’s lawful performance of duties concerning the treatment of the police officer’s 112 report and the arrest of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. E statements;

1. A taxi charge receipt;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographic records;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (limited to the person who has been specially punished): (1) more favorable circumstances that are contrary to the sentence: The unfavorable circumstances that are contrary to the unfavorable circumstances: The defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, background of the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, etc.;