However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On July 1, 2009, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court, and a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime at the same court on March 27, 2014, respectively.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 21:20 on March 3, 2019, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.071% from the front side of the Dog-ri, Dog-ri, Dog-ri, the Dog-ri, the Dog-ri, the Dog-ri, the Dog-ri, and the lower part of the lower part of the Dog-ri, the lower part of which was about 10km, to the lower part of the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Notification of the control results of drinking driving, and report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that choose the penalty for a crime [The choice of imprisonment and driving sections shall be taken into account];

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., the violation of an error and the fact that a traffic accident has not been caused from the driving of this case);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution [The grounds for discretionary mitigation and the fact that there are no criminal records subject to the punishment heavier than the suspended execution];

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;