beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.01.29 2015고단3454

특수주거침입등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On October 2, 2015, the Defendant, who had been aware of about 10 years before the victim C and her neighbors, she flicked and flicked to E and flicked with the victim in the residence of the victim No. 501 of the Dodong-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, Sinsan-si, where he flicked with the victim, while doing a dispute, and she flicked to the defendant's house.

1. Around October 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 01:40, the Defendant, who intrudes upon a special residence, citing a large amount of 42 cm with the length of 42 cm, which is a dangerous object at his house, with the intent to see the victim’s desire to see it; (b) and (c) was invaded on the victim’s residence, which was found in the victim’s residence No. 501 of the Ansan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Building Organization 501; and (d) opened a door and intrudes the victim’s house.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous things and invaded upon the victim's residence.

2. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (injury to a group, deadly weapon, etc.) at the time, time, and place as mentioned in paragraph (1) above, Defendant 42 cm in length, which is a dangerous object for the foregoing reasons, at the same time and place as mentioned in paragraph (1) above, calculated three times in total on one side of the victim’s head, left arms, and left shoulder, and caused the victim to undergo treatment for about 14 days.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted to the effect that the defendant was physically and mentally weak at the time of committing the crime.

According to the records, although the defendant was found to have had the ability to discern things or make decisions, the defendant had the weak ability to discern things or make decisions.

As such, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is without merit)

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Protocols of seizure;