A. In light of the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, the punishment imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. In light of the fact that the prosecutor had a criminal record for the same kind of offense, the sentence imposed by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. We also examine the argument of the Defendant and the prosecutor.

The defendant, without any special reason, injured the victims of the elderly, and interfered with the performance of official duties by using violence to police officers who were performing official duties lawfully.

The victims appealed from the investigative agency to the defendant, and the defendant did not agree with the victims.

Many of the defendants were guilty of violence, and in particular, the defendants were under probation due to the crime of violence at the time of the crime of this case, but did not reflect, and again committed the crime of this case.

These points are disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflected, and the damage caused by the instant crimes is relatively minor, etc. favorable to the Defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances, such as the character, conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, as seen above, since punishment imposed by the court below against the defendant cannot be deemed to be too weak or unreasonable, the defendant and prosecutor's assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.