2...

A. The plaintiff's family relationship is as follows: B (Korean name: C; hereinafter referred to as "C") and D (Korean name: E; hereinafter referred to as "E") and there are children who enjoy or F (G) as a form of punishment, East H (I) and J (K).

B. The Plaintiff’s family’s status of stay and the Plaintiff’s birth 1) Nonparty C, the Plaintiff’s father, entered the Republic of Korea on August 27, 1997, as the residence status (D-7), and the Plaintiff’s mother, as the accompanying (F-3) status on the same day. 2) The Plaintiff was born from the child of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, and was born from the child of Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, and was staying in the Republic of Korea as the accompanying (F-3) status with C’s primary status of stay.

C. On November 17, 200, C continued to extend the period of stay after changing the visa to corporate investment (D-8) capacity on November 17, 2000. On December 30, 2003, Seoul Western District Court Decision 2003Ra1249 sentenced the suspension of execution for two years and six months. On August 31, 2004, Seoul Central District Court Decision 2004No565 delivered on August 31, 2004, dismissed the appeal as Seoul Central District Court Decision 2004Do587 delivered on December 9, 204, and the above judgment became final and conclusive in the Republic of Korea on December 2, 2004, C received a departure order from the Seoul Immigration Office on March 9, 2005 to the departure order on May 27, 2005.

3. Accordingly, E and C’s family members, including the Plaintiff, have lost their accompanying status of stay due to the loss of their primary status of stay in C, and have to leave Korea until February 29, 2008, but E applied for a change to the status of stay for investment on August 10, 2006, but was notified of the decision of disapproval on November 9, 2007;

E does not leave the Republic of Korea after February 29, 2008, which is the last day of the grace period for departure, and even until now, it is without status of stay with children including the plaintiff.