However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 27, 2016, around 09:10, the Defendant visited the victim D (15 years) who resided in the said studio with the Defendant and went out of the studio without any speech to see the play place on the ground that he/she was living in the said studio at around 09:10 on the ground that he/she got out of the studio of the said studio with him/her and went out of the studio without any speech, and b) was flick on the part of the victim's b) and flick back on the part of the victim's b) and flick back on the part of the victim's budio, which is a dangerous object in the room, and " flick flick, flick flick, and flick flick flick flick."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 284 and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the injured person does not want the punishment of the accused, the fact that he is receiving hospitalized treatment for the Gyeong-do mental delay and beyond alcohol dependence, and vice versa);